Self‐leadership behavioural‐focused strategies and team performance

John D. Politis

89 citations0/0 files storedLeadership & Organization Development Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Team Dynamics and Performance Employee Performance and Leadership

Abstract

Purpose Examines the relationship between the dimensions of self‐leadership behavioural‐focused strategies, job satisfaction and team performance. It also evaluates the extent to which job satisfaction mediates the influence of self‐leadership behavioural‐focused strategies on team performance. Design/methodology/approach Involves a questionnaire‐based survey of employees from a manufacturing organisation operating in Australia. A total of 304 useable questionnaires were received from employees who are engaged in self‐managing activities. These were subjected to a series of correlational and regression analyses. Findings There are three major findings in this research. First, the relationship between self‐leadership behavioural‐focused strategies and job satisfaction is direct, positive and significant. Second, the relationship between job satisfaction and team performance is positive and significant. Finally, the results have clearly shown that job satisfaction mediates the relation between self‐leadership behavioural‐focused strategies and team performance. Research limitations/implications The cross‐sectional nature of the study renders it vulnerable to some problems so that future studies should measure self‐leadership behavioural‐focused strategies, job satisfaction and performance using longitudinal data and/or data from multiple sources. Practical implications The study suggests that organisations emphasising empowerment should utilise training programs aimed at developing employees' self‐leadership behavioural‐focused strategies that focus on self‐assessment, self‐reward and self‐discipline. Originality/value The paper is the first to examine self‐leadership behavioural‐focused strategies influences through a covariance structure analysis. It also clarifies the mediating affects of job satisfaction on the self‐leadership behavioural‐focused strategies/team performance relationship.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 89 citations exist upstream.

References

1992Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit 1986Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects 1982Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency.1987Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations 1973A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis 1988Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size.1990Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications, 3rd ed.1979Scales for the measurement of some work attitudes and aspects of psychological well‐being

Cited by

2010Team Self-Managing Behaviors and Team Effectiveness: The Moderating Effect of Task Routineness 2013Cohesion and satisfaction as mediators of the team trust – team effectiveness relationship 2012Goal Orientation and Work Role Performance: Predicting Adaptive and Proactive Work Role Performance Through Self-Leadership Strategies 2014A Path Model of Workplace Solidarity, Satisfaction, Burnout, and Motivation 2021The mediation effect of quality of worklife and job satisfaction in the relationship between spiritual leadership to employee performance

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.