Do We Still Need Peer Review?: An Argument for Change

Thomas H. P. Gould

13 citations0/0 files stored

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Publishing and Scholarly Communication Academic Writing and Publishing Psychology Research and Bibliometrics

Abstract

Preface Acknowledgements Chapter 1: What Is Peer Review and Why Do We Need It? Chapter 2: Early Peer Review Chapter 3: Peer Review 1600-1950 Chapter 4: Anonymous, Double-Blind Peer Review Chapter 5: The Rise of the Internet, the Supremacy of the Individual Chapter 6: Recent Suggested Solutions Chapter 7: Option One - Eliminate Peer Review (partially and totally) Chapter 8: Can We Review Ourselves? Chapter 9: Private Industry and Academic Associations Solve It All (But Are Tenure Committees Left Holding the Bag?) Chapter 10: The Future of Peer Review: What Have We Lost and What Can We Gain? In Closing

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 13 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2015Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references 2015Knowledge production, critique and peer review in feminist publishing: reflections from Agenda 2016Control model for the alignment of the quality assessment of scientific documents based on the analysis of content-related context 2014Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references 2018Beyond Scholarly Publishing: The Human Dimension of Peer Review in LIS

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.