SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Do We Still Need Peer Review?: An Argument for Change
0 references·5 citing·21 second hop
Do We Still Need Peer Review?: An Argument for Change (2012)Do We Still Need Peer Review?: An Argumen…Beyond Scholarly Publishing: The Human Dimension of Peer Review in LIS (2018)Beyond Scholarly Publishing: …Control model for the alignment of the quality assessment of scientific documents based on the analysis of content-related context (2016)Control model for the alignme…Knowledge production, critique and peer review in feminist publishing: reflections from Agenda (2015)Knowledge production, critiqu…Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Growth rates of modern scienc…Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2014)Growth rates of modern scienc…On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task (1960)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)The natural selection of bad science (2016)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective (1988)Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. (1992)Dipesh Chakrabarty . Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. (Princeton Studies in Culture/Power/History.) Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2000. Pp. xii, 301. Cloth $55.00, paper $16.95 (2001)Vehicle for Southern African Knowledge? Men and Masculinities and Research from South Africa (2019)Reviewing is caring! Revaluing a critical, but invisibilized, underappreciated, and exploited academic practice (2025)Citation Statistics (2009)Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time (2015)Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts? (2015)On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View of Psychotherapy (1961)Freedom to learn :a view of what education might become (1969)Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy (1980)The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey (2012)Comparison of three meta-analytic methods using data from digital interventions on type 2 diabetes (2018)BIP! DB: A Dataset of Impact Measures for Scientific Publications (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2015Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references1,799 cited
  • 2015Knowledge production, critique and peer review in feminist publishing: reflections from Agenda12 cited
  • 2016Control model for the alignment of the quality assessment of scientific documents based on the analysis of content-related context10 cited
  • 2014Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references10 cited
  • 2018Beyond Scholarly Publishing: The Human Dimension of Peer Review in LIS8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work