Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

STUDIES IN THE USE AND VALIDITY OF THE THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST WITH MENTALLY DISORDERED PATIENTS. I. METHOD OF ANALYSIS AND CLINICAL PROBLEMS*

2 references·16 citing·32 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1939Explorations in Personality.1,976 cited
1935A METHOD FOR INVESTIGATING FANTASIES568 cited

Cited by

1945The use of projective methods of personality measurement in army medical installations41 cited
1948Frequencies of themes and identifications in the stories of schizophrenic patients and non-hospitalized college students.38 cited
1940STUDIES IN THE USE AND VALIDITY OF THE THEMATIG APPERCEPTION TEST WITH MENTALLY DISORDERED PATIENTS. II A QUANTITATIVE VALIDITY STUDY*35 cited
1943The Thematic Apperception and Rorschach Methods of Personality Investigation in Clinical Practice30 cited
1942Rorschach: twenty years after.30 cited
1947The Scoring and Analysis of the Thematic Apperception Test26 cited
1945A note on the reliability of the Thematic Apperception Test.25 cited
1944Dreams and Thematic Apperception Test stories.22 cited
1947Personality factors in symptomatic chronic alcoholism as indicated by the Thematic Apperception Test.19 cited
1947The thematic apperception test. I. Effect of recent experience. II. Some quantitative observations19 cited
1941Projective Methods in the Study of Personality18 cited
1945The clinical use of the Thematic Apperception Test with soldiers.17 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1948Interpreting mood and activity in TAT stories.17 cited

1961TAT performance as a function of anxiety and coping-avoiding behavior.16 cited

1946Some Suggestions Concerning the Administration and Interpretation of the T.A.T.15 cited

1950TAT Responses of Emotionally Disturbed and Emotionally Stable Children: Clinical Judgment versus Normative Data14 cited