Toward a Relational Concept of Uncertainty: about Knowing Too Little, Knowing Too Differently, and Accepting Not to Know

Marcela Brugnach, Art R. P. J. Dewulf, Claudia Pahl‐Wostl, Tharsi C. B. Taillieu

2008-01-01articleEcology and Society386 citationsgold

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Risk Perception and Management Sustainability and Climate Change Governance Complex Systems and Decision Making

Abstract

Brugnach, M., A. Dewulf, C. Pahl-Wostl, and T. Taillieu. 2008. Toward a relational concept of uncertainty: about knowing too little, knowing too differently, and accepting not to know. Ecology and Society 13(2): 30. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02616-130230

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 386 citations exist upstream.

References

1999Communities of practice learning, meaning, and identity

1981The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice

1996Sensemaking in Organizations

1997Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective

2003Defining Uncertainty: A Conceptual Basis for Uncertainty Management in Model-Based Decision Support

1977A mathematical theory of evidence

2001Discrete Choice with Social Interactions

2006Frames, Biases, and Rational Decision-Making in the Human Brain

Cited by

2010Using resilience concepts to investigate the impacts of protected area tourism on communities

2017From data to decisions: Processing information, biases, and beliefs for improved management of natural resources and environments

2014Why do parents who usually vaccinate their children hesitate or refuse? General good vs. individual risk

2017Toward best practice framing of uncertainty in scientific publications: A review of W ater R esources R esearch abstracts

2022Design workshops for innovative cropping systems and decision-support tools: Learning from 12 case studies

2014Searching for a Better Life: Peri‐Urban Migration in Western Para State, Brazil

2016Ambiguity: A new way of thinking about responses to climate change

2015Judgments under uncertainty: evaluations of univocal, ambiguous and conflicting probability information