How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers

Gary Edmond · Kristy A. Martire · Richard I. Kemp · David Hamer · Brynn Hibbert · Andrew Ligertwood +6 more

33 citations0/0 files storedResearchOnline - JCU (James Cook University)

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Legal processes and jurisprudence Criminal Law and Evidence Jury Decision Making Processes

Abstract

This article is a resource for lawyers approaching the cross-examination of\nforensic scientists (and other expert witnesses). Through a series of\nexamples, it provides information that will assist lawyers to explore the\nprobative value of forensic science evidence, in particular forensic\ncomparison evidence, on the voir dire and at trial. Questions covering a\nbroad range of potential topics and issues, including relevance, the\nexpression of results, codes of conduct, limitations and errors, are\nsupplemented with detailed commentary and references to authoritative\nreports and research on the validity and reliability of forensic science\ntechniques.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 33 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2015Fingerprint identification: advances since the 2009 National Research Council report 2021Towards another paradigm for forensic science?2019Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability 2023Human Factors in Forensic Science 2020Exploring juror evaluations of expert opinions using the Expert Persuasion Expectancy framework 2025Psychological insights for judging expertise and implications for adversarial legal contexts

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.