SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers
0 references·9 citing·30 second hop
How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers (2014)How to cross-examine forensic scientists:…Psychological insights for judging expertise and implications for adversarial legal contexts (2025)Psychological insights for ju…Human Factors in Forensic Science (2023)Human Factors in Forensic Sci…Towards another paradigm for forensic science? (2021)Towards another paradigm for …Exploring juror evaluations of expert opinions using the Expert Persuasion Expectancy framework (2020)Exploring juror evaluations o…Improving Expert Evidence: The Role of Open Science and Transparency (2019)Improving Expert Evidence: Th…Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability (2019)Forensic science evidence: Na…Communicating forensic scientific expertise: An analysis of expert reports and corresponding testimony in Tasmanian courts (2019)Communicating forensic scient…Integrating research into operational practice (2015)Integrating research into ope…Fingerprint identification: advances since the 2009 National Research Council report (2015)Fingerprint identification: a…Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications (2005)Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)A formal approach to qualifying and quantifying the ‘goodness’ of forensic identification decisions (2018)Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. (1994)Beyond CSI: Calibrating public beliefs about the reliability of forensic science through openness and transparency (2022)Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. (1987)Probabilistic reporting in criminal cases in the United States: A baseline study (2020)The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (1986)Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. (1994)Likeability and Expert Persuasion: Dislikeability Reduces the Perceived Persuasiveness of Expert Evidence (2021)Influence of expert degree and scientific validity of testimony on mock Jurors' perceptions of credibility (2022)A transparent approach: Openness in forensic science reporting (2024)An Essay concerning Human Understanding (1690)Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (1935)A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE (1955)Shifting forensic science focus from means to purpose: A path forward for the discipline? (2021)The shifting narrative of uncertainty: a case for the coherent and consistent consideration of uncertainty in forensic science (2022)Towards a forensic semiotics (2024)Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. (1998)‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review (2017)Psychology's Renaissance (2017)Mental contamination and mental correction: Unwanted influences on judgments and evaluations. (1994)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)The Bias Blind Spot: Perceptions of Bias in Self Versus Others (2002)Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA): Validity, reliability, cognitive bias, and error rate (2025)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. (1977)The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. (1993)From Forensics to Forensic Science (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2015Fingerprint identification: advances since the 2009 National Research Council report34 cited
  • 2021Towards another paradigm for forensic science?28 cited
  • 2019Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability27 cited
  • 2023Human Factors in Forensic Science20 cited
  • 2020Exploring juror evaluations of expert opinions using the Expert Persuasion Expectancy framework14 cited
  • 2019Communicating forensic scientific expertise: An analysis of expert reports and corresponding testimony in Tasmanian courts11 cited
  • 2019Improving Expert Evidence: The Role of Open Science and Transparency9 cited
  • 2015Integrating research into operational practice5 cited
  • 2025Psychological insights for judging expertise and implications for adversarial legal contexts4 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work