SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Commonality and Diversity in Reviews
0 references·9 citing·33 second hop
Commonality and Diversity in Reviews (2017)Commonality and Diversity in ReviewsRevisitando las revisiones sistemáticas desde la perspectiva metodológica (2023)Revisitando las revisiones si…English Learner Teacher Advocates: A Systematic Literature Review (2022)English Learner Teacher Advoc…Dropout in online higher education. A scoping review from 2014 to 2018 (2020)Dropout in online higher educ…Coherence and the positioning of teachers in professional development programs. A systematic review (2019)Coherence and the positioning…The (Non-)Use of Configurative Reviews in Education (2017)The (Non-)Use of Configurativ…Reviewing evidence for evidence-based policing (2017)Reviewing evidence for eviden…Making the Most of What We Already Know (2016)Making the Most of What We Al…Economic Instruments for Population Diet and Physical Activity Behaviour Change: A Systematic Scoping Review (2013)Economic Instruments for Popu…How explicable are differences between reviews that appear to address a similar research question? A review of reviews of physical activity interventions (2012)How explicable are difference…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Evaluating the Health Impacts of Food and Beverage Taxes (2014)Are Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes Effective? Reviewing the Evidence Through a Marketing Systems Lens (2020)Behavioural pricing effects in tourism: A review of the empirical evidence and its managerial implications (2023)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review (2011)How stakeholder engagement has led us to reconsider definitions of rigour in systematic reviews (2017)Evidence to support delivery of effective health services: a responsive programme of rapid evidence synthesis (2019)Why do all systematic reviews have fifteen studies? (2020)Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences (2006)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Hva kjennetegner forskning på lærerrollen under Kunnskapsløftet? En forskningskartlegging av studier av norske lærere, lærerstudenter og lærerutdannere (2018)Peer review in an Era of Evaluation (2022)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers (2001)Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges (2007)Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures (2009)Crafting a Job: Revisioning Employees as Active Crafters of Their Work (2001)National Center for Education Statistics (2008)Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come (2004)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Explaining persistence in online courses in higher education: a difference-in-differences analysis (2021)Persistence and Dropout in Higher Online Education: Review and Categorization of Factors (2022)Persistence and time challenges in an open online university: a case study of the experiences of first-year learners (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2019Coherence and the positioning of teachers in professional development programs. A systematic review62 cited
  • 2013Economic Instruments for Population Diet and Physical Activity Behaviour Change: A Systematic Scoping Review47 cited
  • 2020Dropout in online higher education. A scoping review from 2014 to 201846 cited
  • 2017The (Non-)Use of Configurative Reviews in Education45 cited
  • 2016Making the Most of What We Already Know25 cited
  • 2023Revisitando las revisiones sistemáticas desde la perspectiva metodológica17 cited
  • 2017Reviewing evidence for evidence-based policing13 cited
  • 2012How explicable are differences between reviews that appear to address a similar research question? A review of reviews of physical activity interventions12 cited
  • 2022English Learner Teacher Advocates: A Systematic Literature Review6 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work