Optional Stopping Performance under Graphic and Numeric CRT Formatting

Abstract

Two experiments sought to determine whether and if so, how, performance varies as a function of the manner in which a progressively unfolding decision problem is displayed over time. A hurricane-tracking scenario was adapted to the “optional-stopping” paradigm, such that subjects elected to continue sampling information or to make a terminal decision (evacuate or stay) at successive points in the storm's development based upon cumulative evidence and future expectations. The display manipulation was minimal in that it applied only to nonpredictive historical data (position information). Despite this conservative test, display formation had a significant effect when time pressure was involved: subjects reached earlier and better terminal decision under the graphic than the numerical format (Experiment 2). The differences reduced to nonsignificance under self-pacing (Experiment 1), although significant improvements were obtained by use of a simple aiding device (calculation of worst-case probabilities). Results are generally consistent with Hammond's cognitive consistency theory.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 42 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.