No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
Why do good bankers sometimes respond with the same disastrous strategies? Rooted in regulatory economics and behavioral finance, the paper offers a taxonomy of effects that narrows the scope of the banks ’ decision making into a funnel-shape and thus, prepares the ground for a financial crisis. The basic message of the paper is that inconsistent decision rules, rigid bank regulations, stakeholder-focused incentive structures within banks and uncritical adoption of innovations may force banks into decisions that are micro-functional, but macro-dysfunctional. Behavioral aspects play a key role in the suggested remedies on the regulatory side (macroprudential regulation, supervision of incentives) and on the banking side (proper reward systems and structured decision making) to re-establish prudent banking.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.