References

• 1974Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change2,807 cited
• 1993Political research quarterly1,578 cited
• 2007Political Constitutionalism668 cited
• 2009Lobbying and Taxes417 cited
• 1995The Appeals Process as a Means of Error Correction224 cited
• 2006The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court202 cited
• 1992Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court199 cited
• 2007Lawyers, Justices, and Issue Salience: When and How Do Legal Arguments Affect the U.S. Supreme Court?105 cited
• 1994Resource Inequalities and Litigation Outcomes in the Philippine Supreme Court95 cited
• 1993Party Capability Theory and Appellate Success in the Supreme Court of Canada, 1949–199290 cited
• 2003English Lawyers between Market and State: The Politics of Professionalism88 cited
• 1998Explaining Executive Success in the U. S. Supreme Court82 cited
• 2012The Decisions and Ideal Points of British Law Lords78 cited
• 1991Party Capability Theory as an Explanation for Intervention Behavior in the English Court of Appeal77 cited
• 2010US Supreme Court Agenda Setting and the Role of Litigant Status