EFECTO DE ILUSTRACIÓN, REALIDAD SOCIAL Y PSICOLOGÍA: EL ENFOQUE SOCIO-CONSTRUCCIONISTA

Abstract

Se ofrece una descripcion metateorica del paradigma del construccionismo social en la psicologia, marcando sus antecedentes y sus propuestas. Se destaca la nocion de un sujeto proactivo y auto-determinado. Se enfatiza el concepto de efecto de ilustracion y su utilidad para comprender e impulsar cambios deseables en la realidad social desde la disciplina. Se analizan brevemente ciertas escuelas historicas en la disciplina, sus concepciones deterministas del sujeto y se las vincula con el concepto nombrado. Finalmente se plantea, a partir de la razon concebida como argumentacion y dialogo, la posibilidad de instituir una psicologia reflexiva y autoconsciente sobre sus efectos sociales a partir de la propuesta clinica del construccionismo.Esto implica a nivel terapeutico flexibilidad, colaboracion y dialogo. Palabras clave Construccionismo social, Efecto de ilustracion,Agencialidad, Reflexion Abstract ENLIGHTENMENT EFFECT, SOCIAL REALITY AND PSYCHOLOGY: THE SOCIAL-CONSTRUCTIONIST APPROACH A methateorical description of the social-constructionist paradigm in psychology is offered, noting it’s precedents and it’s proposals. The notion about a proactive and self-determined subject is highlighted. The concept of enlightenment effect is emphasized, together with its utility to understand and impulse certain desirable changes in social reality from inside the discipline. Certain historical schools of psychology and their respective determinist conceptions about the subject are briefly analyzed and linked with the named concept. Finally, from the idea of reason conceived as argument and dialogue, the possibility of establishing a reflective and selfconcious psychology about its social effects is suggested, from the clinical proposal of social constructionism. This implies, at a therapeutic level, flexibility, collaboration and dialogue. Key words Social constructionism, Enlightenment effect, Agency, Reflection

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 0 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.