SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery
11 references·12 citing·44 second hopsampled
Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery (2010)Standards for reporting randomized contro…STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK… and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll? (2009)STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE…Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors' (2008)Endorsement of the CONSORT St…Prospective randomized double-blind trial of bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation in adults with Tourette syndrome (2007)Prospective randomized double…The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement (2006)The Reporting of Randomized C…Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery (2006)Standards of Reporting of Ran…Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: The way forward (2006)Improving the quality of repo…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Physician Interpretations and…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Randomized controlled trials in surgery and the glass ceiling effect (2019)Randomized controlled trials …Randomized controlled trials comparing surgery to non-operative management in neurosurgery: a systematic review (2019)Randomized controlled trials …Neurosurgical Randomized Controlled Trials—Distance Travelled (2017)Neurosurgical Randomized Cont…Interpretation of CIs in clinical trials with non-significant results: systematic review and recommendations (2017)Interpretation of CIs in clin…Framing of research question using the PICOT format in randomised controlled trials of venous ulcer disease: a protocol for a systematic survey of the literature (2016)Framing of research question …CONSORT in China: past development and future direction (2015)CONSORT in China: past develo…The reporting quality of parallel randomised controlled trials in ophthalmic surgery in 2011: a systematic review (2014)The reporting quality of para…Recent Randomized Controlled Trials in Otolaryngology (2014)Recent Randomized Controlled …Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature (2014)Methodology and reporting of …Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus with Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Systematic Review (2013)Assessment of the Reporting Q…Methodological and Ethical Quality of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials in Gastrointestinal Surgery (2012)Methodological and Ethical Qu…Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in medical informatics: a systematic review of CONSORT adherence in RCTs on clinical decision support (2011)Standards for reporting rando…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 4: Observational Studies (2009)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials of Surgical Interventions (2013)What is an invasive procedure? A definition to inform study design, evidence synthesis and research tracking (2019)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Method and reporting quality in health professions education research: a systematic review (2011)Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019)A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000 (2002)Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trials (2004)The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement (2005)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study (2003)STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)— An Extension of the STROBE Statement (2009)Strengthening the Reporting of Genetic Risk Prediction Studies: The GRIPS Statement (2011)Is Quality and Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Published in High Impact Radiology Journals Associated with Citation Rates? (2015)Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal (2016)THE ASSESSMENT OF ANXIETY STATES BY RATING (1959)Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness (1967)Double-blind clinical trial of thalamic stimulation in patients with Tourette syndrome (2011)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)Tourette syndrome deep brain stimulation: A review and updated recommendations (2014)Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette-Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2015)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews (2014)Defining and Measuring Meditation-Related Adverse Effects in Mindfulness-Based Programs (2021)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2007Prospective randomized double-blind trial of bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation in adults with Tourette syndrome287 cited
  • 2001Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials256 cited
  • 2008Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'241 cited
  • 2006Standards of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials in General Surgery161 cited
  • 2006The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement140 cited
  • 2009STREGA, STROBE, STARD, SQUIRE, MOOSE, PRISMA, GNOSIS, TREND, ORION, COREQ, QUOROM, REMARK… and CONSORT: for whom does the guideline toll?116 cited
  • 2006Improving the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery: The way forward67 cited

Cited by

  • 2014Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature60 cited
  • 2011

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in medical informatics: a systematic review of CONSORT adherence in RCTs on clinical decision support
52 cited
  • 2017Interpretation of CIs in clinical trials with non-significant results: systematic review and recommendations41 cited
  • 2014The reporting quality of parallel randomised controlled trials in ophthalmic surgery in 2011: a systematic review37 cited
  • 2012Methodological and Ethical Quality of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials in Gastrointestinal Surgery33 cited
  • 2017Neurosurgical Randomized Controlled Trials—Distance Travelled25 cited
  • 2015CONSORT in China: past development and future direction25 cited
  • 2014Recent Randomized Controlled Trials in Otolaryngology25 cited
  • 2019Randomized controlled trials comparing surgery to non-operative management in neurosurgery: a systematic review23 cited
  • 2019Randomized controlled trials in surgery and the glass ceiling effect22 cited
  • 2016Framing of research question using the PICOT format in randomised controlled trials of venous ulcer disease: a protocol for a systematic survey of the literature20 cited
  • 2013Assessment of the Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Treatment of Diabetes Mellitus with Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Systematic Review19 cited