SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials
3 references·16 citing·40 second hop
Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of databases in tracing published adverse drug reactions in clinical trials (2001)Incomplete evidence: the inadequacy of da…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas. (2001)Completeness of safety report…Reporting of Adverse Effects in Clinical Trials Should Be Improved (1999)Reporting of Adverse Effects …The reporting of adverse events following spinal manipulation in randomized clinical trials—a systematic review (2016)The reporting of adverse even…Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews (2014)Comparison of search strategi…Discordance Between Conclusions Stated in the Abstract and Conclusions in the Article: Analysis of Published Randomized Controlled Trials of Systemic Therapy in Lung Cancer (2012)Discordance Between Conclusio…Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Finding evidence for comparin…Comprehensive evaluations of the adverse effects of drugs: importance of appropriate study selection and data sources (2011)Comprehensive evaluations of …Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality (2009)Systematic reviews of adverse…Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review (2009)Search strategies to identify…Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results (2008)Reporting of adverse events i…Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects (2008)Poor reporting and inadequate…CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration (2008)CONSORT for reporting randomi…Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects (2006)Room for improvement? A surve…Selective exposure reporting and Medline indexing limited the search sensitivity for observational studies of the adverse effects of oral contraceptives (2005)Selective exposure reporting …Reporting of Harm in Randomized, Controlled Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment for Rheumatic Disease (2005)Reporting of Harm in Randomiz…Safety Reporting in Randomized Trials of Mental Health Interventions (2004)Safety Reporting in Randomize…Assessing harmful effects in systematic Reviews (2004)Assessing harmful effects in …Balancing benefits and harms in health care (2003)Balancing benefits and harms …Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Reporting of adverse drug reactions in randomised controlled trials – a systematic survey (2001)Challenges in Systematic Reviews That Assess Treatment Harms (2005)Adherence to CONSORT Adverse Event Reporting Guidelines in Randomized Clinical Trials Evaluating Systemic Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review (2013)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)How to spot bias and other potential problems in randomised controlled trials (2004)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Cannabis in the management of PTSD: a systematic review (2021)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews (2008)Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms (2021)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (1999)Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review (2010)PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews (2016)Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)The Cochrane Library (2005)Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Perfect Study, Poor Evidence: Interpretation of Biases Preceding Study Design (2008)Reporting of harms in clinical trials of esketamine in depression: a systematic review (2023)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Prospective comparison of search strategies for systematic reviews: an objective approach yielded higher sensitivity than a conceptual one (2016)Evaluating the factors that influence cloud technology adoption—comparative case analysis of health and non-health sectors: A systematic review (2019)Data Market Design: A Systematic Literature Review (2022)Reproducibility of Literature Search Reporting in Medical Education Reviews (2011)It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks (2018)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Characteristics of systematic reviews in the social sciences (2021)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas.564 cited
  • 1999Reporting of Adverse Effects in Clinical Trials Should Be Improved167 cited

Cited by

  • 2003Balancing benefits and harms in health care104 cited
  • 2008Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects99 cited
  • 2004Safety Reporting in Randomized Trials of Mental Health Interventions84 cited
  • 2006Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects73 cited
  • 2004Assessing harmful effects in systematic Reviews69 cited
  • 2008Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results64 cited
  • 2014Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews55 cited
  • 2009Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality54 cited
  • 2005Selective exposure reporting and Medline indexing limited the search sensitivity for observational studies of the adverse effects of oral contraceptives54 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration53 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2011Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program52 cited
  • 2005Reporting of Harm in Randomized, Controlled Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment for Rheumatic Disease49 cited
  • 2011Comprehensive evaluations of the adverse effects of drugs: importance of appropriate study selection and data sources49 cited
  • 2016The reporting of adverse events following spinal manipulation in randomized clinical trials—a systematic review44 cited
  • 2012Discordance Between Conclusions Stated in the Abstract and Conclusions in the Article: Analysis of Published Randomized Controlled Trials of Systemic Therapy in Lung Cancer43 cited
  • 2009Search strategies to identify information on adverse effects: a systematic review42 cited