SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The quandary between communication and certification
16 references·2 citing·52 second hop
The quandary between communication and certification (2015)The quandary between communication and ce…The Use of Altmetrics as a Tool for Measuring Research Impact (2015)The Use of Altmetrics as a To…Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing (2014)Opening Science: The Evolving…Academic sell-out: how an obsession with metrics and rankings is damaging academia (2014)Academic sell-out: how an obs…The impact factor: a useful indicator of journal quality or fatally flawed? (2013)The impact factor: a useful i…Scholarship in the digital age: Open educational resources, publication and public engagement (2013)Scholarship in the digital ag…Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker's perspective (2013)Five challenges in altmetrics…Scholarly Communication 2.0: Exploring Researchers' Opinions on Web 2.0 for Scientific Knowledge Creation, Evaluation and Dissemination (2011)Scholarly Communication 2.0: …Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications (2010)Adoption and use of Web 2.0 i…Looking Ahead to the Next 75 Years for The Journal of Pediatrics and Medical Publishing (2009)Looking Ahead to the Next 75 …Digitize this book!: the politics of new media, or why we need open access now (2009)Digitize this book!: the poli…Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication: Results of an Investigation Conducted by Ithaka Strategic Services for the Association of Research Libraries (2009)Current Models of Digital Sch…English or Chinese? The trade-off between local and international publication among Chinese academics in the humanities and social sciences (2008)English or Chinese? The trade…Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication: Results of an Investigation Conducted by Ithaka for the Association of Research Libraries. (2008)Current Models of Digital Sch…The rise and rise of citation analysis (2007)The rise and rise of citation…Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000 (2003)Changing trends in publishing…Evidence on peer review—scientific quality control or smokescreen? (1999)Evidence on peer review—scien…Open scholarship in Australia: A review of needs, barriers, and opportunities (2020)Open scholarship in Australia…Understanding Open Knowledge in China: A Chinese Approach to Openness? (2018)Understanding Open Knowledge …An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Citation counting, citation ranking, and h ‐index of human‐computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008)Non-Governmental and Not-for-Profit Organizational Effectiveness: A Modern Synthesis (2011)Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements (2017)The frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)Little Science, Big Science (1963)What is research collaboration? (1997)The academic researcher role: enhancing expectations and improved performance (2012)A macro analysis of productivity differences across fields: Challenges in the measurement of scientific publishing (2013)Is environmental management accounting a discipline? A bibliometric literature review (2013)Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys (1977)PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet (2011)Metric Power and the Academic Self: Neoliberalism, Knowledge and Resistance in the British University (2018)Understanding psychology's resistance to intersectionality theory using a framework of epistemic exclusion and invisibility (2020)Guidelines for Theory Selection: The IMPACT Framework (2025)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)US and Non-US Submissions (1998)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)A randomized controlled study of reviewer bias against an unconventional therapy (2000)Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability. (2008)Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches (2009)Chronicle of Higher Education (1998)Wikinomics: how mass collaboration changes everything (2007)4 What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software (2012)Web Indicators for Research Evaluation: A Practical Guide (2016)Altmetric scores: An early indicator of research impact (2018)Quantifying and contextualizing the impact of bioRxiv preprints through automated social media audience segmentation (2020)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Translanguaging in Chinese foreign language classrooms: students and teachers’ attitudes and practices (2016)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2017)Linguistic Injustice in the Writing of Research Articles in English as a Second Language: Data From Taiwanese and Mexican Researchers (2018)Mapping the Literature on Academic Publishing: A Bibliometric Analysis on WOS (2023)Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events (1989)Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants (2012)Evaluating altmetrics (2013)Opening Science (2013)Diffusion of Innovations 1 (2019)Open Innovation: The New Imperative For Creating and Profiting From Technology (2004)Internet encyclopaedias go head to head (2005)Credit, time, and personality: The human challenges to sharing scholarly work using Web 2.0 (2012)Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms (2015)Scholarly Twitter Metrics (2019)The access principle: the case for open access to research and scholarship (2006)How We Think: Transforming Power and Digital Technologies (2012)The Cambridge Companion to Textual Scholarship (2012)Open Access and the Humanities: Contexts, Controversies, and the Future (2017)Opening science: towards an agenda of open science in academia and industry (2014)Evidence-Based Science Communication (2020)Socio-technical scales in socio-environmental modeling: Managing a system-of-systems modeling approach (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The rise and rise of citation analysis371 cited
  • 2008English or Chinese? The trade-off between local and international publication among Chinese academics in the humanities and social sciences198 cited
  • 2010Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications190 cited
  • 2003Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000139 cited
  • 2014Academic sell-out: how an obsession with metrics and rankings is damaging academia133 cited
  • 2014Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing120 cited
  • 2009Digitize this book!: the politics of new media, or why we need open access now100 cited
  • 2011Scholarly Communication 2.0: Exploring Researchers' Opinions on Web 2.0 for Scientific Knowledge Creation, Evaluation and Dissemination98 cited
  • 1999Evidence on peer review—scientific quality control or smokescreen?97 cited
  • 2015The Use of Altmetrics as a Tool for Measuring Research Impact77 cited
  • 2013Scholarship in the digital age: Open educational resources, publication and public engagement75 cited
  • 2008Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication: Results of an Investigation Conducted by Ithaka for the Association of Research Libraries.68 cited
  • 2013Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker's perspective62 cited
  • 2013

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The impact factor: a useful indicator of journal quality or fatally flawed?
44 cited
  • 2009Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication: Results of an Investigation Conducted by Ithaka Strategic Services for the Association of Research Libraries33 cited
  • 2009Looking Ahead to the Next 75 Years for The Journal of Pediatrics and Medical Publishing17 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2018Understanding Open Knowledge in China: A Chinese Approach to Openness?12 cited
    • 2020Open scholarship in Australia: A review of needs, barriers, and opportunities9 cited