Clinic of Activity: The Dialogue as Instrument

Abstract

This chapter highlights three important dimensions of Yrjö Engeström's work. It then examines some objections that have been recently addressed to him. Finally, the chapter presents an original French approach that is not sufficiently well known internationally, although some publications in languages other than French have recently appeared (Béguin & Clot, 2004; Clot, Fernandez, & Carles, 2002; Clot & Scheller, 2006). Engeström has, in his own way, allowed the “French-speaking school” of analysis of activity to come into contact and enter into discussions with the Anglo-Saxon world. In France this discussion was recently relaunched with the symposium “Situated Action and Activity Theory” (ARTCO) in Lyon, where researchers from different countries met to debate their conceptions of “action,” “activity,” and “collective” (Clot, 2005a; Engeström, 2006b). TRANSFORMING FOR UNDERSTANDING The position given by Engeström to transformative action in the workplace brings him very close to the French-speaking school of analysis of work and activity. Whereas international ergonomics focused on the engineering of task and artifacts, French-speaking ergonomics was organized around activity and health with the intention of preserving and developing the operators' power to act in the workplace. Vygotsky's work is indeed inseparable from this perspective on action. When Vygotsky analyzed the crisis of psychology, he pointed to practice as a means to overcome the crisis. He even presented practice as a real alternative to the blind empiricism that can paralyze psychology (Vygotsky, 1997a), as is still the case today.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 80 citations exist upstream.