Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: a reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity

Abstract

Introduction Most learners of a second language (L2) feel concerned with the burden of vocabulary learning and worry about the question of how to cope with the formidable task of learning thousands of words. This has been documented by a number of questionnaire, interview and case studies (Gu & Johnson, 1996; Jones, 1995; Lawson & Hogden, 1996; Porte, 1988; Sanaoui, 1995). Because of the sheer magnitude of the vocabulary learning task it is only quite natural that many L2 teachers feel uncertain about how to guide their students. Should they require their students to learn words intentionally, perhaps even by rote, or should they believe the rumours that intentional learning is not conducive to language learning? How much credence should they give to ideas like ‘new vocabulary must be presented in context’ and ‘the best way to acquire vocabulary is by “picking up” words incidentally, as a by-product of being exposed to large amounts of L2 input in reading and listening tasks’? This chapter will look at what various theories have to say about incidental and intentional vocabulary learning. It will focus especially on three issues of key importance for L2 pedagogy: (1) the quality of information processing when an unfamiliar word is first encountered; (2) the quantity and quality of rehearsal activities needed for a word to be permanently available; and (3) the training of automatic access to word knowledge necessary for fluent language use.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 769 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.