SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
NGRI Revisited: Venirepersons' Attitudes Toward the Insanity Defense1
11 references·5 citing·47 second hop
NGRI Revisited: Venirepersons' Attitudes Toward the Insanity Defense1 (2006)NGRI Revisited: Venirepersons' Attitudes …The Role of Death Qualification in Venirepersons' Attitudes Toward the Insanity Defense1 (2006)The Role of Death Qualificati…On finding for defendants who plead insanity: The crucial impact of dispositional instructions and opportunity to deliberate. (2001)On finding for defendants who…Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases. (1995)Comprehensibility of approved…Jury selection in insanity defense cases (1992)Jury selection in insanity de…Comprehension of judges' instructions in the penalty phase of a capital trial: Focus on mitigating circumstances. (1992)Comprehension of judges' inst…The social construction of criminal responsibility and insanity. (1991)The social construction of cr…The Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984: Much ado about nothing (1989)The Insanity Defense Reform A…Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers (1989)Psychological Evaluations for…How jurors construe "insanity." (1989)How jurors construe "insanity…The death-qualified jury and the defense of insanity. (1984)The death-qualified jury and …Making jury instructions understandable (1983)Making jury instructions unde…The influence of defendant race and mental disorder type on mock juror decision-making in insanity trials (2019)The influence of defendant ra…Determining criminal responsibility: How relevant are insight and personal attitudes to mock jurors? (2015)Determining criminal responsi…Attitudes Toward the Insanity Defense in Capital Cases: (Im)partiality fromWitherspoontoWitt (2011)Attitudes Toward the Insanity…Measuring knowledge of the insanity defense: Scale construction and validation (2010)Measuring knowledge of the in…Measuring Attitudes toward the Insanity Defense in Venirepersons: Refining the IDA-R in the Evaluation of Juror Bias (2009)Measuring Attitudes toward th…Personality, cognition, and social interaction (1982)A hypothesis-confirming bias in labeling effects. (1983)Commonsense justice and jury instructions: Instructive and reciprocating connections. (2000)Guided jury discretion in capital murder cases: The role of declarative and procedural knowledge. (2004)The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death? (2005)Personality, Cognition and Social Interaction (2017)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957)The Social Construction of Reality (1967)Demythologizing inaccurate perceptions of the insanity defense. (1994)Psychopathic traits predict attitudes toward a juvenile capital murderer (2003)Crime-Show-Viewing Habits and Public Attitudes Toward Forensic Evidence: The “CSI Effect” Revisited (2010)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (2017)The Limits of the Criminal Sanction (1968)The Limits of the Criminal Sanction (1969)Harvard Civil Rights: Civil Liberties Law Review (1993)An empirical investigation of insanity defense attitudes: Exploring factors related to bias (2006)Law and Psychiatry: Rethinking the Relationship (1984)Law, psychiatry, and morality (1985)"Empirical research on the insanity defense and attempted reforms: Evidence toward informed policy": Erratum. (1999)The relationship between criminal charges, diagnoses, and psycholegal opinions among federal pretrial defendants (2001)Deconstructing the simplification of jury instructions: How simplifying the features of complexity affects jurors’ application of instructions. (2017)A theory of personality : the psychology of personal constructs (1963)The American Jury (1971)The self-defense defense and community sentiment. (1991)THE PSYCHOLOGY OF PERSONAL CONSTRUCTS (2010)The construction and validation of a juror bias scale (1983)Judging the jury (1986)A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors' perceptions of defendant culpability. (1993)Effects of pretrial juror bias, strength of evidence and deliberation process on juror decisions: new validity evidence of the Juror Bias Scale scores (2003)Constructing insanity: jurors' prototypes, attitudes, and legal decision‐making (2007)Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions (1979)The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure (1985)The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials (2007)Jury decision‐making biases and methods to counter them (2009)Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences (2013)Behavioral sciences and the law. (1966)Accountability and complexity of thought. (1983)Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. (1989)“It will be your duty…:” The Psychology of Criminal Jury Instructions (2016)Juror decision making in not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder trials: Effects of defendant gender and mental illness type (2016)The Role of Defendant Race and Racially Charged Media in Canadian Mock Juror Decision Making (2018)A Prevention-Based Paradigm for Violence Risk Assessment (2002)Assessing Violence Risk and Psychopathy in Juvenile and Adult Offenders: A Survey of Clinical Practices (2010)Risk Assessment in Criminal Sentencing (2015)Improving the Ability of Jurors to Comprehend and Apply Criminal Jury Instructions (1982)The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. (1989)Justice, liability, and blame: community views and the criminal law (1995)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1989Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers293 cited
  • 1983Making jury instructions understandable125 cited
  • 1995Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases.84 cited
  • 1984The death-qualified jury and the defense of insanity.69 cited
  • 1991The social construction of criminal responsibility and insanity.68 cited
  • 1989How jurors construe "insanity."64 cited
  • 1992Jury selection in insanity defense cases63 cited
  • 1992Comprehension of judges' instructions in the penalty phase of a capital trial: Focus on mitigating circumstances.54 cited
  • 1989The Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984: Much ado about nothing46 cited
  • 2001On finding for defendants who plead insanity: The crucial impact of dispositional instructions and opportunity to deliberate.30 cited
  • 2006The Role of Death Qualification in Venirepersons' Attitudes Toward the Insanity Defense129 cited

Cited by

  • 2009Measuring Attitudes toward the Insanity Defense in Venirepersons: Refining the IDA-R in the Evaluation of Juror Bias22 cited
  • 2010Measuring knowledge of the insanity defense: Scale construction and validation20 cited
  • 2019The influence of defendant race and mental disorder type on mock juror decision-making in insanity trials

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

16 cited
  • 2011Attitudes Toward the Insanity Defense in Capital Cases: (Im)partiality fromWitherspoontoWitt15 cited
  • 2015Determining criminal responsibility: How relevant are insight and personal attitudes to mock jurors?13 cited