References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

• 2011If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony39 cited
• 2011Avoiding probabilistic reasoning fallacies in legal practice using Bayesian networks35 cited
• 2012Renegotiating forensic cultures: Between law, science and criminal justice33 cited
• 2015Paradigms of forensic science and legal process: a critical diagnosis32 cited
• 2013The psychology of interpreting expert evaluative opinions28 cited
• 2019Forensic science evidence: Naive estimates of false positive error rates and reliability27 cited
• 2013Calculating and understanding the value of any type of match evidence when there are potential testing errors25 cited
• 2016Calculation of likelihood ratios for gunshot residue evidence—statistical aspects22 cited
• 2018A response to “Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look” by Lund and Iyer20 cited
• 2014Liberties and constraints of the normative approach to evaluation and decision in forensic science: a discussion towards overcoming some common misconceptions19 cited
• 2017On the Bayesian approach to forensic age estimation of living individuals19 cited
• 2012How to assign a likelihood ratio in a footwear mark case: an analysis and discussion in the light of R v T18 cited
• 2016Using Bayesian networks to guide the assessment of new evidence in an appeal case