SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Biomedical review articles: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.
2 references·6 citing·29 second hop
Biomedical review articles: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. (1989)Biomedical review articles: what editors …Guidelines for reading literature reviews. (1988)Guidelines for reading litera…The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)The Medical Review Article: S…Supuestos teóricos para la gamificación de la educación superior (2019)Supuestos teóricos para la ga…Revisión sistemática o revisión narrativa? (2013)Revisión sistemática o revisi…Referencing patterns of individual researchers: Do top scientists rely on more extensive information sources? (2012)Referencing patterns of indiv…Quality of reviews in epidemiology. (1998)Quality of reviews in epidemi…Unvarnished viewpoints and scientific scrutiny. Letter to the editor provide a forum for readers and help make a journal accountable to the medical community. (1997)Unvarnished viewpoints and sc…Literature Review Articles as a Research Form (1993)Literature Review Articles as…Biomedical manuscripts: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers. (1989)Health services research: reporting on studies using secondary data sources. (1996)Reporting on surveys: information for authors and peer reviewers. (1996)Helpful Hints: Writing Effective Letters to the Editor (2006)La carta al editor en la publicación científica. Consideraciones para su elaboración (2021)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. (1992)Qualitative Research: Rigour and qualitative research (1995)Does monitoring goal progress promote goal attainment? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. (2015)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Science in Action (1987)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Scholarly interest in gamification: a citation network analysis (2014)The influence of R&D intensity of countries on the impact of international collaborative research: evidence from Spain (2014)Number of references: a large-scale study of interval ratios (2020)Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1994)Methods in epidemiology and public health: does practice match theory? (2001)Depressivität, Angst und posttraumatische Belastungsstörung bei Arbeitsmigranten, Asylbewerbern und Flüchtlingen (2008)The Methodological Soundness of Literature Reviews Addressing Three Potential Zoonotic Public Health Issues (2009)Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Trends in Global Higher Education: Tracking an Academic Revolution (2010)The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-based Methods and Strategies for Training and Education (2012)Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research (2014)Gamification and Game-Based Learning as Cooperative Learning Tools: A Systematic Review (2023)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1987The Medical Review Article: State of the Science857 cited
  • 1988Guidelines for reading literature reviews.492 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Supuestos teóricos para la gamificación de la educación superior48 cited
  • 2013Revisión sistemática o revisión narrativa?35 cited
  • 1998Quality of reviews in epidemiology.34 cited
  • 2012Referencing patterns of individual researchers: Do top scientists rely on more extensive information sources?30 cited
  • 1997Unvarnished viewpoints and scientific scrutiny. Letter to the editor provide a forum for readers and help make a journal accountable to the medical community.16 cited
  • 1993Literature Review Articles as a Research Form15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work