Journal Rankings in Economics: Handle with Care

Abstract

Nearly all journal rankings in economics use some weighted average of citations to calculate a journal's impact.These rankings are often used, formally or informally, to help assess the publication success of individual economists or institutions.Although ranking methods and opinions are legion, scant attention has been paid to the usefulness of any ranking as representative of the many articles published in a journal.First, because the distributions of citations across articles within a journal are seriously skewed, and the skewness differs across journals, the appropriate measure of central tendency is the median rather than the mean.Second, large shares of articles in the highest-ranked journals are cited less frequently than typical articles in much-lower-ranked journals.Finally, a ranking that uses the h-index is very similar to one that uses total citations, making it less than ideal for assessing the typical impact of articles within a journal.(

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.