Metaphysics, Intuitions and Physics

Jonathan Tallant

9 citations0/0 files storedRatio

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Philosophy, Science, and History Philosophy and Theoretical Science Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics

Abstract

Abstract Ladyman and Ross (2007) do not think that contemporary metaphysics is in good standing. However, they do think that there is a version of metaphysics that can be made to work – provided we approach it using appropriate principles. My aim in this paper is to undermine some of their arguments against contemporary metaphysics as it is currently practiced.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.

References

1998Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises 2010Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data 2007Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors 2004Scientists behaving badly 2007The Privileged Present: Defending an 'A-Theory' of Time 1994A Nobel's eye view of scientific intuition: discussions with the Nobel prize‐winners in physics, chemistry and medicine (1970‐86)2008COMPOSITION AS A SECONDARY QUALITY

Cited by

2023Naturalized metaphysics or displacing metaphysicians to save metaphysics

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.