Explaining the Tenure of Local Government Managers

Abstract

Attempts to explain manager tenure based on conflict or ambition have systematically examined neither local government institutions that define the powers and contractual obligations of managers nor more macro political system structures. Analysis of tenure patterns for eighty-one local government managers confirms both the conflictual environment in which managers work and career characteristics influencing patterns of tenure. We add to this by demonstrating the importance of employment institutions in shaping a manager's choices and tenure. We find that the influence of push and pull factors is contingent upon the context of the employment relationship. The use of employment agreements influences tenure but in an intervening, rather than additive, manner. We conclude that the structure of employment institutions is important not only because it may structure personal incentives, but because it may also either insulate the manager from conflict in the community or propel him or her to the center of such conflict.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 60 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.