Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Meta‐analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies: a new statistical model using beta‐binomial distributions and bivariate copulas

16 references·16 citing·41 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1999An Introduction to Copulas7,743 cited
1998Understanding Relationships Using Copulas1,258 cited
2008Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy1,124 cited
2006A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies752 cited
2006Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach709 cited
1981On Nonparametric Measures of Dependence for Random Variables601 cited
2007A Primer on Copulas for Count Data339 cited
2007A Primer on Copulas for Count Data305 cited
2009Copula goodness-of-fit testing: an overview and power comparison270 cited
2007Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and the estimation of between-study correlation244 cited
2008An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary217 cited
2010Modeling Multivariate Distributions Using Copulas: Applications in Marketing172 cited
2010Bayesian bivariate meta‐analysis of diagnostic test studies using integrated nested Laplace approximations98 cited
2009Meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: Alternative parameterizations and model selection91 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2009

Bivariate Random Effects Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Studies Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models

90 cited

2010Bivariate random effects models for meta-analysis of comparative studies with binary outcomes: Methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk78 cited

Cited by

2017Bayesian bivariate meta‐analysis of diagnostic test studies with interpretable priors48 cited
2020Many meta-analyses of rare events in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were underpowered48 cited
2023Methods for deriving risk difference (absolute risk reduction) from a meta-analysis47 cited
2015A mixed effect model for bivariate meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution45 cited
2021Copulae: An overview and recent developments43 cited
2014Methods for the joint meta‐analysis of multiple tests40 cited
2018meta4diag: Bayesian Bivariate Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Studies for Routine Practice40 cited
2018Bivariate random‐effects meta‐analysis models for diagnostic test accuracy studies using arcsine‐based transformations39 cited
2014Meta-analysis of Proportions of Rare Events–A Comparison of Exact Likelihood Methods with Robust Variance Estimation36 cited
2015A vine copula mixed effect model for trivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence34 cited
2021Synthesis of evidence from zero‐events studies: A comparison of one‐stage framework methods34 cited
2016Meta-analysis for the comparison of two diagnostic tests to a common gold standard: A generalized linear mixed model approach28 cited
2017An improved method for bivariate meta‐analysis when within‐study correlations are unknown25 cited
2015Meta‐analysis of studies with bivariate binary outcomes: a marginal beta‐binomial model approach22 cited
2018bamdit: An R Package for Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Data22 cited
2014Performance measures of the bivariate random effects model for meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy21 cited