References

• 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
• 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
• 2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2,534 cited
• 2002Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions993 cited
• 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
• 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
• 1991Agreement among reviewers of review articles283 cited
• 2000Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation263 cited
• 2000Size and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: review of published studies148 cited
• 2005Evaluating Meta-analyses in the General Surgical Literature129 cited
• 2007The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal*112 cited
• 2002