No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
The argument that automatic processes are responsible for affective/evaluative\npriming effects has been primarily based on studies that have manipulated the\nstimulus onset asynchrony (SOA; i.e., the interval between the onset of the prime\nand the onset of the target). Moreover, these SOA studies provide an insight in the\ntime course of the activation processes underlying automatic affect/attitude activation.\nBased on a fine-grained manipulation of the SOA employing either the\nevaluative decision task (Experiment 1) and the pronunciation task (Experiment 2)\nwe concluded that affective priming, and hence automatic affect activation, is\nbased on fast-acting automatic processes. The results of Experiment 3 provide a\nvalid explanation for an apparent discrepancy between the results of Experiments 1\nand 2 and previous findings. Finally, the results of Experiment 3 support the\nprediction of Jarvis and Petty (1996) that affective priming effects should be\nstronger for participants who are more chronically engaged in conscious evaluations.
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 262 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.