Article1999

The ACID Test ‐ Or Is It?

10 citations0/0 files storedEducational Psychology in Practice

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology Reading and Literacy Development Educational and Psychological Assessments

Abstract

Summary The professional and research bases for the use of the ACID (Arithmetic, Coding, Information, Digit Span) profile in the identification and assessment of pupils who have specific learning difficulties (SpLD) are critically reviewed. The statements made about the ACID profile in the Hillingdon judgment are examined in relation to the available research evidence. Implications are drawn for professionally defensible practice by educational psychologists.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 10 citations exist upstream.

References

1990Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised 1979Intelligent testing with the WISC-R 1995Intelligent testing with the WISC-III 1990Just Say No to Subtest Analysis: A Critique on Wechsler Theory and Practice 1984A Meta-Analysis of the Validity of Wechsler Scale Profiles and Recategorizations: Patterns Or Parodies?1993Base rates of WISC-III diagnostic subtest patterns among normal, learning-disabled, and ADHD samples.1997Discriminant and predictive validity of the WISC-III ACID profile among children with learning disabilities 1974Programs, Materials and Techniques

Cited by

2012The dyslexia debate

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.