Dimensional variation in the proximal ulna: Evaluation of a metric method for sex assessment

Lynne S. Cowal · Robert F. Pastor

68 citations0/0 files storedAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology Forensic and Genetic Research

Abstract

The determination of sex is one of the fundamental assessments in the production of a biological profile for human skeletal remains, and a large number of studies have focused on evaluating sexual dimorphism metrically. A recent study of a contemporary American population presented high classification accuracies from discriminant function analysis of the proximal ulna (Grant and Jant,2003). The present research tests this method using a large sample (223 skeletons: 114 males and 109 females) from two skeletal assemblages of European origin, the documented Spitalfields Coffin-Plate Collection (N = 171) and the archaeological Raunds Furnells Collection (N = 52). The three measurements from the original study (Grant and Jant,2003), defined as the notch length (NL), the width of the olecranon process (OW), and the height of the coronoid process (CH) were tested, with the addition of a new variable radial notch height (RNH). Significant differences (P < 0.001) were found between male and female ulna measurements. Discriminant analysis found the original discriminant equation classified individuals with accuracies of only 40% for males but 99% for females. New discriminant functions were developed using direct and stepwise analyses of the Spitalfields sample. A direct multivariate function based on four dimensions (NL, OW, CH, RNH) produced an overall classification accuracy of 85.4% (males 82.4%; females 88.4%). A second function based on the original three measurements (NL, OW, CH) yielded nearly identical classification accuracies (males 81%; females 88.5%). Crossvalidation of the Spitalfields data using the three-variable function yielded an overall classification rate of 84.2%. This study indicates that the ulna is sexually dimorphic but its development is population-specific.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 68 citations exist upstream.

References

1963The human skeleton in forensic medicine 1952Estimation of stature from long bones of American Whites and Negroes 1998Forensic Osteology: Advances in the Identification of Human Remains 2000Human Osteology : In Archaeology and Forensic Science 1991Anthropologie. Handbuch der vergleichenden biologie des menschen 1979Essentials of Forensic Anthropology, Especially As Developed in the United States 2001Sex determination and estimation of stature from the long bones of the arm 1983Cross‐sectional geometry of Pecos Pueblo femora and tibiae—A biomechanical investigation: II. Sex, age, and side differences

Cited by

2009Bodyscapes, Biology, and Heteronormativity 2011Sex assessment from the carpals bones: Discriminant function analysis in a 20th century Spanish sample 2023Sex estimation from long bones: a machine learning approach 2015Sex determination using discriminant analysis of upper and lower extremity bones: New approach using the volume and surface area of digital model 2016Sexual determination based on multidetector computed tomographic measurements of the second cervical vertebra in a contemporary Japanese population

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.