SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology
9 references·16 citing·46 second hop
Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology (2006)Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews ar…Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine (2002)Assessing the quality of repo…A Comparison of the Quality of Cochrane Reviews and Systematic Reviews Published in Paper-Based Journals (2002)A Comparison of the Quality o…Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature (2001)Evaluating the quality of sys…Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation (2000)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Methodology and Reports of Sy…Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: A systematic qualitative review of their methodology (1996)Meta-analyses to evaluate ana…Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles (1994)Systematic Reviews: Checklist…Validation of an index of the quality of review articles (1991)Validation of an index of the…Agreement among reviewers of review articles (1991)Agreement among reviewers of …Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades (2024)Comparative analysis of Cochr…Half of Cochrane reviews were published more than 2 years after the protocol (2020)Half of Cochrane reviews were…Assessing the compliance of systematic review articles published in leading dermatology journals with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review (2020)Assessing the compliance of s…Searching for qualitative health research required several databases and alternative search strategies: a study of coverage in bibliographic databases (2019)Searching for qualitative hea…Following Cochrane review protocols to completion 10 years later: a retrospective cohort study and author survey (2019)Following Cochrane review pro…A Quality Analysis of Systematic Reviews in Dentistry, Part 1: Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2017)A Quality Analysis of Systema…“Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review” (2017)“Assessing the methodological…Bibliometric characteristics of systematic reviews in dermatology: A cross-sectional study through Web of Science and Scopus (2015)Bibliometric characteristics …Quantifying Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in Child Health: A Meta-Epidemiological Study (2014)Quantifying Bias in Randomize…Overview of systematic reviews - a new type of study. Part II (2014)Overview of systematic review…Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination (2014)Methodological quality of sys…Mapping Systematic Reviews on Atopic Eczema—An Essential Resource for Dermatology Professionals and Researchers (2013)Mapping Systematic Reviews on…Transparent reporting of studies relevant to physical therapy practice (2011)Transparent reporting of stud…The Growth of Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews in Informing Dermatological Patient Care (2011)The Growth of Clinical Trials…The Quality of Meta-Analyses of Genetic Association Studies: A Review With Recommendations (2009)The Quality of Meta-Analyses …A systematic review evaluating the potential for bias and the methodological quality of meta-analyses in vaccinology (2007)A systematic review evaluatin…Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology – A systematic review (2009)Quality of Conduct and Reporting of Meta-analyses of Surgical Interventions (2015)Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study (2017)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (2000)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Religion/spirituality and adolescent health outcomes: a review (2006)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)The relative efficacy of avoidant and nonavoidant coping strategies: A meta-analysis. (1985)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery (2001)How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine (2003)Mind-Body Medicine: State of the Science, Implications for Practice (2003)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1994)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF): properties and frontier of current knowledge (2010)Burnout in university teaching staff: a systematic literature review (2011)How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)Meta-Analysis in Clinical Research (1987)Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic Tests (1994)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions (2011)Users' Guides to the Medical Literature (1994)Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews (2014)Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature (2014)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Developing systematic search methods for the library literature: Methods and analysis (2020)Literature searching methods or guidance and their application to public health topics: A narrative review (2021)Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on rapid qualitative evidence synthesis (2024)Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study (2005)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 3: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials (2009)Methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies: a survey of reviews of basic research (2006)The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal* (2007)Evidence-based or biased? The quality of published reviews of evidence-based practices (2008)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1991Validation of an index of the quality of review articles788 cited
  • 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles480 cited
  • 1991Agreement among reviewers of review articles283 cited
  • 2000Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation263 cited
  • 1996Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: A systematic qualitative review of their methodology205 cited
  • 2002A Comparison of the Quality of Cochrane Reviews and Systematic Reviews Published in Paper-Based Journals111 cited
  • 2001Evaluating the quality of systematic reviews in the emergency medicine literature81 cited
  • 2002Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine81 cited

Cited by

  • 2019Searching for qualitative health research required several databases and alternative search strategies: a study of coverage in bibliographic databases46 cited
  • 2014Quantifying Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in Child Health: A Meta-Epidemiological Study43 cited
  • 2014Overview of systematic reviews - a new type of study. Part II42 cited
  • 2014Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination40 cited
  • 2009The Quality of Meta-Analyses of Genetic Association Studies: A Review With Recommendations

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

39 cited
  • 2011The Growth of Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews in Informing Dermatological Patient Care36 cited
  • 2011Transparent reporting of studies relevant to physical therapy practice36 cited
  • 2020Half of Cochrane reviews were published more than 2 years after the protocol35 cited
  • 2007A systematic review evaluating the potential for bias and the methodological quality of meta-analyses in vaccinology31 cited
  • 2019Following Cochrane review protocols to completion 10 years later: a retrospective cohort study and author survey28 cited
  • 2015Bibliometric characteristics of systematic reviews in dermatology: A cross-sectional study through Web of Science and Scopus21 cited
  • 2017A Quality Analysis of Systematic Reviews in Dentistry, Part 1: Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials20 cited
  • 2024Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades19 cited
  • 2017“Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in radiation oncology: A systematic review”18 cited
  • 2020Assessing the compliance of systematic review articles published in leading dermatology journals with the PRISMA statement guidelines: A systematic review17 cited
  • 2013Mapping Systematic Reviews on Atopic Eczema—An Essential Resource for Dermatology Professionals and Researchers16 cited