Intermediaries driving eco‐innovation in SMEs: a qualitative investigation

Johanna Klewitz · Anica Zeyen · Erik G. Hansen

228 citations0/0 files storedEuropean Journal of Innovation Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Environmental Sustainability in Business Sustainable Supply Chain Management Sustainability and Innovation in Business

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify the role intermediaries can play in an small to medium‐sized enterprise's (SME's) pursuit for corporate sustainability with a focus on eco‐innovation. The research identifies drivers and barriers for eco‐innovation, and highlights effects induced through collaboration between SMEs and local authorities, on the one hand, and consultancies, on the other. Design/methodology/approach This paper is based on an exploratory qualitative interview study among German SMEs of the metal and mechanical engineering industry that have participated in “Ecoprofit”, an intermediary based program that aims at introducing organizations to the concept of sustainable development through implementation of eco‐innovations. Findings The key findings are that first, the proactive approach by a public intermediary (here local authority) is one essential push factor to trigger eco‐innovations in SMEs with low absorptive capacity. Second, it is found that SMEs may need facilitation for eco‐innovation from different types of intermediaries (public and private) with different levels of support, which can range from customized and individual to more loosely held support, such as networks. Originality/value This study discusses the challenges of corporate sustainability with a focus on eco‐innovations for SMEs and proposes a “complex intermediary” consisting of a local authority and consultancies as one means to engage SMEs in sustainability. Moreover, it focuses on SMEs in the B2B context, organizations that are often overlooked despite their vast impact. Furthermore, by using a single industry approach, in‐depth findings for the metal and mechanical engineering industry are presented.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 228 citations exist upstream.

References

1990Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation 2009Building theories from case study research 2002Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension 1997Interpreting Qualitative Data Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction 2002Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability 2000Redefining innovation — eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics 2006The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct 1997Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions

Cited by

2017Harnessing Difference: A Capability‐Based Framework for Stakeholder Engagement in Environmental Innovation 2021Green credit regulation, induced R&D and green productivity: Revisiting the Porter Hypothesis 2020Technological Capabilities, Open Innovation, and Eco-Innovation: Dynamic Capabilities to Increase Corporate Performance of SMEs 2021The collaborative roles of stakeholders in supporting the adoption of sustainability in SMEs 2019

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.