Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Opinion writing and acclimation effect

10 references·16 citing·33 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1993The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model979 cited
1988On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court162 cited
1987Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics136 cited
1993"Freshman Effects" for Supreme Court Justices124 cited
1960Quantitative Analysis of Judicial Behavior.115 cited
2005The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States113 cited
1968On the Fluidity of Judicial Choice100 cited
1958The Supreme Court as a Small Group95 cited
1993Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Law and the Inner Self88 cited
1972Policy Goals, Strategic, Choice and Majority Opinion Assignments in the U. S. Supreme Court75 cited

Cited by

2003Acclimation Effects and Separate Opinion Writing in the U.S. Courts of Appeals*67 cited
1998"Acclimation Effects" for Supreme Court Justices: A Cross-Validation, 1888-194065 cited
2008Change over Tenure: Voting, Variance, and Decision Making on the U.S. Courts of Appeals64 cited
2008Amici Curiae and Dissensus on the U.S. Supreme Court63 cited
2005Passing and Strategic Voting on the U.S. Supreme Court

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

57 cited

2012Race and Gender Bias in Three Administrative Contexts: Impact on Work Assignments in State Supreme Courts48 cited

2011Are Judicial Performance Evaluations Fair to Women and Minorities? A Cautionary Tale from Clark County, Nevada40 cited

2004Acclimation and Attitudes: "Newcomer" Justices and Precedent Conformance on the Supreme Court40 cited

20105 Judges as Members of Small Groups36 cited

20107 Is There a Psychology of Judging?36 cited

2011Does Prosecutorial Experience “Balance Out” a Judge's Liberal Tendencies?33 cited

2022Does Group Familiarity Improve Deliberations in Judicial Teams? Evidence from the German Federal Court of Justice32 cited

20101 Motivation and Judicial Behavior: Expanding the Scope of Inquiry29 cited

2020A Court of Specialists26 cited

2005The role of attitudinal, institutional and environmental factors in explaining variations in the dissent rate on the High Court of Australia26 cited

20103 Top-Down and Bottom-Up Models of Judicial Reasoning22 cited