Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A checklist for critical appraisal of indirect comparisons

12 references·2 citing·44 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2011Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 11,036 cited
2003Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses944 cited
2011Conducting Indirect-Treatment-Comparison and Network-Meta-Analysis Studies: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 2770 cited
2005Indirect comparisons of competing interventions680 cited
2011Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed361 cited
2012How to Use an Article Reporting a Multiple Treatment Comparison Meta-analysis360 cited
2010Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality145 cited
2011NICE DSU Technical Support Document 1: Introduction to Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making109 cited
2014The Quality of Reporting Methods and Results in Network Meta-Analyses: An Overview of Reviews and Suggestions for Improvement105 cited
2014Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked increase since 200990 cited
2012NICE DSU Technical Support Document 7: Evidence Synthesis of Treatment Efficacy in Decision Making: A Reviewer’s Checklist38 cited
2012Síntesis de la evidencia clínica y metaanálisis en red con comparaciones indirectas25 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2024Methodological review of NMA bias concepts provides groundwork for the development of a list of concepts for potential inclusion in a new risk of bias tool for network meta-analysis (RoB NMA Tool)18 cited
2025Updating the PRISMA reporting guideline for network meta-analysis: a scoping review14 cited