SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Does mode matter? A comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys
16 references·2 citing·29 second hop
Does mode matter? A comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys (2009)Does mode matter? A comparison of telepho…Handbook on Contingent Valuation (2006)Handbook on Contingent Valuat…Social Desirability Bias in Contingent Valuation Surveys Administered Through In-Person Interviews (2003)Social Desirability Bias in C…Valuing the non-market benefits of wild goose conservation: a comparison of interview and group based approaches (2002)Valuing the non-market benefi…A Comparison of Hypothetical Phone and Mail Contingent Valuation Responses for Green-Pricing Electricity Programs (2000)A Comparison of Hypothetical …The Contingent valuation of environmental resources: methodological issues and research needs (1996)The Contingent valuation of e…Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation (1994)Valuing the Environment Throu…Universal Health Insurance in the Clinton Plan: Coverage as a Tax-Financed Public Good (1994)Universal Health Insurance in…The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care (1994)The Contingent Valuation Deba…Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? (1994)Contingent Valuation: Is Some…Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method (1990)Using surveys to value public…Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method (1989)Using surveys to value public…Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method (1987)Valuing Environmental Goods: …Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. (1982)Mail and Telephone Surveys: T…Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. (1979)Mail and Telephone Surveys: T…Interviews by Telephone and in Person: Quality of Responses and Field Performance (1976)Interviews by Telephone and i…Methodological Bias in Public Opinion Surveys (1972)Methodological Bias in Public…The worth of wildlife: A meta-analysis of global non-market values of threatened species (2019)The worth of wildlife: A meta…Social Desirability Bias in Survey Research on Sustainable Development in Small Firms: an Exploratory Analysis of Survey Mode Effect (2011)Social Desirability Bias in S…Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction (1992)The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out (1997)Report by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress (2011)Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition (2000)Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? (1979)Contingent Valuation: A User's Guide (2000)Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay (2010)Cents and Sensibility: Economic Valuation and the Nature of “Nature” (2011)American Economic Review (2019)Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method (1990)A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation (1996)The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments (2010)Willingness to pay for carbon offset certification and co-benefits among (high-)flying young adults in the UK (2009)Are Internet surveys an alternative to face-to-face interviews in contingent valuation? (2011)Valuing Mortality Risk Reductions from Environmental, Transport, and Health Policies: A Global Meta‐Analysis of Stated Preference Studies (2011)Empirics of World Income Inequality (1999)Rationality, institutions and environmental policy (2005)Using economic valuation techniques to inform water resources management: A survey and critical appraisal of available techniques and an application (2006)Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review (1985)Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. (2001)Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys (2006)What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values? (2001)A Review of WTA/WTP Studies (2002)The contingent valuation method: a review (2003)Statistical Efficiency of Double‐Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation (1991)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1982Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.6,852 cited
  • 1979Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method.5,023 cited
  • 1989Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method4,215 cited
  • 1994Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?1,927 cited
  • 1994Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation1,643 cited
  • 1990Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method1,067 cited
  • 1987Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method1,054 cited
  • 1994The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care852 cited
  • 1994Universal Health Insurance in the Clinton Plan: Coverage as a Tax-Financed Public Good356 cited
  • 2006Handbook on Contingent Valuation272 cited
  • 2003Social Desirability Bias in Contingent Valuation Surveys Administered Through In-Person Interviews209 cited
  • 1976Interviews by Telephone and in Person: Quality of Responses and Field Performance195 cited
  • 2002Valuing the non-market benefits of wild goose conservation: a comparison of interview and group based approaches188 cited
  • 1996The Contingent valuation of environmental resources: methodological issues and research needs171 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2000
A Comparison of Hypothetical Phone and Mail Contingent Valuation Responses for Green-Pricing Electricity Programs
166 cited
  • 1972Methodological Bias in Public Opinion Surveys154 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2011Social Desirability Bias in Survey Research on Sustainable Development in Small Firms: an Exploratory Analysis of Survey Mode Effect131 cited
    • 2019The worth of wildlife: A meta-analysis of global non-market values of threatened species68 cited