SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Methods and interpretation in systematic reviews: Commentary on two parallel reviews of epidural analgesia during labor
10 references·0 citing·42 second hop
Methods and interpretation in systematic reviews: Commentary on two parallel reviews of epidural analgesia during labor (2002)Methods and interpretation in systematic …Characteristics of meta-analyses related to acceptance for publication in a medical journal (2001)Characteristics of meta-analy…What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (2000)What contributions do languag…Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German (1997)Language bias in randomised c…Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews (1996)Completeness of reporting of …Cochrane Collaboration helping unravel tangled web woven by international research. (1996)Cochrane Collaboration helpin…Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: Is there a tower of babel bias? (1995)Selecting the language of the…NIH clinical trials and publication bias. (1993)NIH clinical trials and publi…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Publication bias and clinical trials (1987)Publication bias and clinical…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The file drawer problem and t…The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in ‘meta‐epidemiological’ research (2002)The prevalence of suicidal thoughts and behaviours among college students: a meta-analysis (2017)Excluding non-English publications from evidence-syntheses did not change conclusions: a meta-epidemiological study (2019)Artifact in behavioral research (1969)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Annals of the American association of geographers (2016)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research (1991)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)Exploring Heterogeneity and Publication Bias (2006)Factors influencing editors' decision on acceptance or rejection of manuscripts: the authors' perspective. (2008)Do meta-analyses in nephrology change the way we treat patients? (2010)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement (2000)Uses and abuses of meta-analysis (2001)Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: I. Getting started. (1998)Mejora de la calidad de los informes de los metaanálisis de los ensayos clínicos controlados: el acuerdo QUOROM (2000)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 3: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials (2009)Socioeconomic Inequalities in Depression: A Meta-Analysis (2003)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.9,043 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 1997Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German1,029 cited
  • 1987Publication bias and clinical trials715 cited
  • 1996Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews538 cited
  • 1995Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: Is there a tower of babel bias?527 cited
  • 2000What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses?454 cited
  • 1996Cochrane Collaboration helping unravel tangled web woven by international research.398 cited
  • 1993NIH clinical trials and publication bias.293 cited
  • 2001Characteristics of meta-analyses related to acceptance for publication in a medical journal35 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work