SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Discordance between Meta-analyses and Large-Scale Randomized, Controlled Trials: Examples from the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction
0 references·16 citing·47 second hopsampled
Discordance between Meta-analyses and Large-Scale Randomized, Controlled Trials: Examples from the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction (1995)Discordance between Meta-analyses and Lar…Viewpoint: taking into account risks of random errors when analysing multiple outcomes in systematic reviews (2016)Viewpoint: taking into accoun…Evidence-based clinical practice: Overview of threats to the validity of evidence and how to minimise them (2016)Evidence-based clinical pract…Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods (2014)Thresholds for statistical an…Association Between Analytic Strategy and Estimates of Treatment Outcomes in Meta-analyses (2014)Association Between Analytic …Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries (2012)Robust meta-analytic conclusi…Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned (2006)Adjustment of meta-analyses o…Being sceptical about meta-analyses: a Bayesian perspective on magnesium trials in myocardial infarction (2002)Being sceptical about meta-an…Evolution of treatment effects over time: Empirical insight from recursive cumulative metaanalyses (2001)Evolution of treatment effect…Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses (2000)Heterogeneity and statistical…Unresolved Issues in Scientific Sexology (1999)Unresolved Issues in Scientif…Recursive Cumulative Meta-analysis (1999)Recursive Cumulative Meta-ana…Pooling Research Results: Benefits and Limitations of Meta-Analysis (1999)Pooling Research Results: Ben…Issues in Comparisons Between Meta-analyses and Large Trials (1998)Issues in Comparisons Between…Strengths and limitations of meta-analysis: Larger studies may be more reliable (1997)Strengths and limitations of …Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews (1997)Quantitative Synthesis in Sys…Large Trials vs Meta-analysis of Smaller Trials (1996)Large Trials vs Meta-analysis…Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)A random‐effects regression model for meta‐analysis (1995)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes (2010)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)The case of the misleading funnel plot (2006)The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (2007)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. (2011)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Publication and related bias in meta-analysis (2000)Reported Methodologic Quality and Discrepancies between Large and Small Randomized Trials in Meta-Analyses (2001)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses (2009)Influence of trial sample size on treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study (2013)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research (2010)The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers (2018)Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study (2019)Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Meta-analysis as Evidence (2014)An algorithm was developed to assign GRADE levels of evidence to comparisons within systematic reviews (2015)New evidence pyramid (2016)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis (2017)Assessing imprecision in Cochrane systematic reviews: a comparison of GRADE and Trial Sequential Analysis (2018)Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder (2020)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (2000)Meta‐research: The art of getting it wrong (2010)A meta-analytic review of personality traits and their associations with mental health treatment outcomes (2019)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1997Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews2,515 cited
  • 2014Thresholds for statistical and clinical significance in systematic reviews with meta-analytic methods704 cited
  • 2000Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses370 cited
  • 1996Large Trials vs Meta-analysis of Smaller Trials355 cited
  • 1998Issues in Comparisons Between Meta-analyses and Large Trials253 cited
  • 2014Association Between Analytic Strategy and Estimates of Treatment Outcomes in Meta-analyses237 cited
  • 1997Strengths and limitations of meta-analysis: Larger studies may be more reliable237 cited
  • 2006Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned212 cited
  • 2001Evolution of treatment effects over time: Empirical insight from recursive cumulative metaanalyses195 cited
  • 1999Pooling Research Results: Benefits and Limitations of Meta-Analysis159 cited
  • 2002Being sceptical about meta-analyses: a Bayesian perspective on magnesium trials in myocardial infarction121 cited
  • 2016Evidence-based clinical practice: Overview of threats to the validity of evidence and how to minimise them109 cited
  • 2012Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries105 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 1999Recursive Cumulative Meta-analysis84 cited
  • 1999Unresolved Issues in Scientific Sexology71 cited
  • 2016Viewpoint: taking into account risks of random errors when analysing multiple outcomes in systematic reviews67 cited