SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned · Study

ReviewAdjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned

Peter Herbison2006

Review2006

Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned

Peter Herbison · Jean E. Hay-Smith · William John Gillespie

207 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials Delphi Technique in Research

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 207 citations exist upstream.

References

1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?1998The Delphi List 2003Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis 1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial

Cited by

2011The Process Writing Approach: A Meta-analysis 2010A systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases 2017The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials 2014Poor Reliability between Cochrane Reviewers and Blinded External Reviewers When Applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool in Physical Therapy Trials

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2013Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysisreview · 13 shared references 2018Stratification by quality induced selection bias in a meta-analysis of clinical trialsreview · 12 shared references 2019A unified framework for bias assessment in clinical researchreview · 12 shared references 2005Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional studyreview · 10 shared references 2003Research methods: Managing primary study quality in meta‐analysesreview · 10 shared references 2003Methods For Evidence Synthesis in Interventional Pain Managementarticle · 10 shared references

Details

Year2006

Typereview

Published2006-09-12

VenueJournal of Clinical Epidemiology

ISSN-L0895-4356

Languageen

Citations207

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.008

openalex_workW2071955543

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2014A Research Methodology to Conduct Effective Research Syntheses: Meta-Analysis

2010Association between framing of the research question using the PICOT format and reporting quality of randomized controlled trials

2010Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses

2018Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis