SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned
16 references·16 citing·32 second hopsampled
Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned (2006)Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis …Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (2003)Updated Method Guidelines for…Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality (2002)Quality of Reporting of Rando…On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions (2001)On the bias produced by quali…The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Hazards of Scoring the Qu…The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)The feasibility of creating a…The Delphi List (1998)The Delphi ListDoes quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Does quality of reports of ra…Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Discrepancies between Meta-An…Large Trials vs Meta-analysis of Smaller Trials (1996)Large Trials vs Meta-analysis…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Assessing the quality of repo…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Invited Commentary: A Critical Look at Some Popular Meta-Analytic Methods (1994)Invited Commentary: A Critica…Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis (1992)Incorporating variations in t…Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis (1989)Methodology and overt and hid…A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)A method for assessing the qu…Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis (2018)Three risk of bias tools lead…The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials (2017)The PEDro scale had acceptabl…Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 6: risk of bias assessment (2017)Quasi-experimental study desi…The development and validation of a meta-tool for quality appraisal of public health evidence: Meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT) (2016)The development and validatio…Introduction to systematic reviews and meta‐analysis (2016)Introduction to systematic re…Quality assessment tools for evidence from environmental science (2014)Quality assessment tools for …Poor Reliability between Cochrane Reviewers and Blinded External Reviewers When Applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool in Physical Therapy Trials (2014)Poor Reliability between Coch…Assessment of Methodologic Quality of Randomized Trials of Interventional Techniques: Development of an Interventional Pain Management Specific Instrument (2014)Assessment of Methodologic Qu…A Research Methodology to Conduct Effective Research Syntheses: Meta-Analysis (2014)A Research Methodology to Con…The Process Writing Approach: A Meta-analysis (2011)The Process Writing Approach:…Meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials: An empirical example (2010)Meta-analysis of heterogeneou…Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses (2010)Combining heterogenous studie…Association between framing of the research question using the PICOT format and reporting quality of randomized controlled trials (2010)Association between framing o…A systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases (2010)A systematic review of tools …Methodological Issues in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies in Orthopaedic Research (2009)Methodological Issues in Syst…Study Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews of Research on Intervention Effects (2008)Study Quality Assessment in S…Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (2004)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Methodological index for non‐randomized studies ( MINORS ): development and validation of a new instrument (2003)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. (2010)Scales to Assess the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review (2007)2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group (2009)The Pittsburgh sleep quality index as a screening tool for sleep dysfunction in clinical and non-clinical samples: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2015)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Positive Psychological Well-Being and Mortality: A Quantitative Review of Prospective Observational Studies (2008)Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses (2008)
this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

  • 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
  • 1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.8,247 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
  • 1998The Delphi List2,379 cited
  • 2003Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group2,179 cited
  • 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
  • 1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
  • 1992Incorporating variations in the quality of individual randomized trials into meta-analysis640 cited
  • 1994Invited Commentary: A Critical Look at Some Popular Meta-Analytic Methods508 cited
  • 2002Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials as a Measure of Methodologic Quality397 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2001On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions359 cited
  • 1989Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis338 cited
  • 1996Large Trials vs Meta-analysis of Smaller Trials336 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2011The Process Writing Approach: A Meta-analysis372 cited
    • 2010A systematic review of tools used to assess the quality of observational studies that examine incidence or prevalence and risk factors for diseases202 cited
    • 2017The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials176 cited
    • 2014Poor Reliability between Cochrane Reviewers and Blinded External Reviewers When Applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool in Physical Therapy Trials124 cited
    • 2014A Research Methodology to Conduct Effective Research Syntheses: Meta-Analysis122 cited
    • 2010Association between framing of the research question using the PICOT format and reporting quality of randomized controlled trials119 cited
    • 2010Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses114 cited
    • 2018Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis111 cited
    • 2014Quality assessment tools for evidence from environmental science107 cited
    • 2016Introduction to systematic reviews and meta‐analysis101 cited
    • 2009Methodological Issues in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies in Orthopaedic Research100 cited
    • 2017Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 6: risk of bias assessment97 cited
    • 2008Study Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews of Research on Intervention Effects95 cited
    • 2010Meta-analysis of heterogeneous clinical trials: An empirical example91 cited
    • 2016The development and validation of a meta-tool for quality appraisal of public health evidence: Meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT)90 cited
    • 2014Assessment of Methodologic Quality of Randomized Trials of Interventional Techniques: Development of an Interventional Pain Management Specific Instrument85 cited