Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Comment on Cooke's classical method

14 references·16 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1975Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases22,647 cited
1982Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases3,643 cited
1989Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography2,170 cited
1982Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 19801,966 cited
2000The M3-Competition: results, conclusions and implications1,700 cited
1982The accuracy of extrapolation (time series) methods: Results of a forecasting competition1,465 cited
1990Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography1,465 cited
1976Scoring Rules for Continuous Probability Distributions950 cited
1999Combining Probability Distributions From Experts in Risk Analysis824 cited
1995Subjective probability364 cited
1993The M2-competition: A real-time judgmentally based forecasting study264 cited
1989A General Method for Comparing Probability Assessors181 cited
2004Probability Judgments for Continuous Quantities: Linear Combinations and Calibration136 cited
1988Analyzing the accuracy of probability judgments for multiple events: An extension of the covariance decomposition42 cited

Cited by

2014The Aggregation of Expert Judgment: Do Good Things Come to Those Who Weight?

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

123 cited

2021Developing a reference protocol for structured expert elicitation in health-care decision-making: a mixed-methods study102 cited

2011Aggregating expert judgement94 cited

2013Trimmed Opinion Pools and the Crowd's Calibration Problem76 cited

2018Modified Fuzzy Group Decision-Making Approach to Cost Overrun Risk Assessment of Power Plant Projects60 cited

2013The effect of the number of seed variables on the performance of Cooke′s classical model59 cited

2016A comparison of two methods for expert elicitation in health technology assessments59 cited

2015There is Data, and then there is Data: Only Experimental Evidence will Determine the Utility of Differential Weighting of Expert Judgment54 cited

2011Comparison of a new expert elicitation model with the Classical Model, equal weights and single experts, using a cross-validation technique51 cited

2020Aggregating predictions from experts: A review of statistical methods, experiments, and applications51 cited

2020Weighting and aggregating expert ecological judgments50 cited

2013Probabilistic Coherence Weighting for Optimizing Expert Forecasts48 cited

2019Combining prediction intervals in the M4 competition47 cited

2012Combining Experts’ Judgments: Comparison of Algorithmic Methods Using Synthetic Data43 cited

2019Improving expert forecasts in reliability: Application and evidence for structured elicitation protocols38 cited

2009The reliability of aggregated probability judgments obtained through Cooke's classical model37 cited