Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Searching CINAHL did not add value to clinical questions posed in NICE guidelines

6 references·6 citing·48 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2003LITERATURE SEARCHING FOR RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS USED IN COCHRANE REVIEWS: RAPID VERSUS EXHAUSTIVE SEARCHES693 cited
2003Literature searching for clinical and cost-effectiveness studies used in health technology assessment reports carried out for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence appraisal system194 cited
2004Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: added value or diminishing returns?143 cited
2005A nursing qualitative systematic review required MEDLINE and CINAHL for study identification129 cited
2001Comparison of bibliographic databases for information on the rehabilitation of people with severe mental illness.67 cited
2009MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane index most primary studies but not abstracts included in orthopedic meta-analyses62 cited

Cited by

2022A Tailored Approach: A model for literature searching in complex systematic reviews23 cited
2017Is there an optimum number needed to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review search?18 cited
2021Overlaps of multiple database retrieval and citation tracking in dementia care research: a methodological study16 cited
2025Supplementary databases increased literature search coverage beyond PubMed and Embase16 cited
2014A mapping review of the literature on UK ‐focused health and social care databases12 cited
2022Database coverage and their use in systematic reviews regarding spinal manipulative therapy: an exploratory study10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work