Validation of Empirically Derived Rating Scales for a Story Retelling Speaking Test

Abstract

In recognition of the rating scale as a crucial tool of performance assessment, this study aims to establish a rating scale suitable for a Story Retelling Speaking Test (SRST), which is a semidirect test of speaking ability in English as a foreign language for classroom use. To identify an appropriate scale, three rating scales, all of which have been designed to have diagnostic functions, were developed for the SRST and compared in terms of their reliability, validity, and practicality. The three scales were (a) an empirically derived, binary-choice, boundary-definition (called EBB1) scale, which has four criteria (Communicative Efficiency, Content, Grammar & Vocabulary, and Pronunciation); (b) an EBB2 scale that was modified from the EBB1 scale and has three criteria (Communicative Efficiency, Grammar & Vocabulary, and Pronunciation); and (c) a multiple-trait (MT) scale that was modified from the EBB2 but has a conventional analytic scale format. The results of the comparison revealed that the EBB2 was the most reliable and valid measure for assessing speech performance in the context of story retelling. However, the MT scale was shown to be the most practical, even though the EBB2 permits more careful scoring, which suggests the influence of the rating scale format on test qualities.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.