Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: a meta-analysisTimo Gnambs, Kai Kaspar2014-11-20reviewBehavior Research Methods421 citationsbronzeNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Survey Methodology and NonresponseSurvey Sampling and Estimation TechniquesMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 421 citations exist upstream.References1979The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.2008Internet, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method2000The Psychology of Survey Response2014Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys2007Sensitive questions in surveys.2010Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis2004Should We Trust Web-Based Studies? A Comparative Analysis of Six Preconceptions About Internet Questionnaires.2011Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature reviewCited by2019Suicide prediction models: a critical review of recent research with recommendations for the way forward2020Meta-analysis of gender differences in body appreciation2022Don't Miss the Moment: A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Suicide Research2022Prediction of Suicide Attempts Using Clinician Assessment, Patient Self-report, and Electronic Health Records2018The Structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale2021Are social desirability scales desirable? A meta‐analytic test of the validity of social desirability scales in the context of prosocial behavior2020Attitudes and understanding are only part of the story: self-control, age and self-imposed pressure predict plagiarism over and above perceptions of seriousness and understanding2022Online versus face‐to‐face cheating: The prevalence of cheating behaviours during the pandemic compared to the pre‐pandemic among Turkish University students