Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Studying pretrial publicity effects: New methods for improving ecological validity and testing external validity.

8 references·11 citing·49 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1999The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?682 cited
1999The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts: A meta-analytic review.180 cited
1979A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm: The case of defendant characteristics.174 cited
1997Pretrial publicity: The media, the law, and common sense.79 cited
1979Use of the simulation method in the study of jury behavior: Some methodological considerations.76 cited
1981Methodological considerations in the study of the psychology of the courtroom66 cited
1995Measuring the Extent of Prejudicial Pretrial Publicity in Major American Newspapers: A Content Analysis57 cited
2000Assessing pretrial publicity effects: Integrating content analytic results.39 cited

Cited by

2014Examining pretrial publicity in a shadow jury paradigm: Issues of slant, quantity, persistence and generalizability.28 cited
2018The media’s impact on the right to a fair trial: A content analysis of pretrial publicity in capital cases.27 cited
2007The Role of Death Qualification in Jurors' Susceptibility to Pretrial Publicity126 cited
2007A third verdict option: Exploring the impact of the not proven verdict on mock juror decision making.22 cited
2011A comparison of students' and jury panelists' decision‐making in split recovery cases21 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2011

How reason for surgery and patient weight affect verdicts and perceptions in medical malpractice trials: A comparison of students and jurors

20 cited

2006The influence of sample type, presentation format and strength of evidence on juror simulation research18 cited

2015The impact of note taking style and note availability at retrieval on mock jurors’ recall and recognition of trial information16 cited

2012Assisting jurors: Promoting recall of trial information through the use of a trial‐ordered notebook14 cited

2011Twelve (not so) angry men14 cited

2021Likeability and Expert Persuasion: Dislikeability Reduces the Perceived Persuasiveness of Expert Evidence13 cited