On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.

Abstract

The authors examine the practice of dichotomization of quantitative measures, wherein relationships among variables are examined after 1 or more variables have been converted to dichotomous variables by splitting the sample at some point on the scale(s) of measurement. A common form of dichotomization is the median split, where the independent variable is split at the median to form high and low groups, which are then compared with respect to their means on the dependent variable. The consequences of dichotomization for measurement and statistical analyses are illustrated and discussed. The use of dichotomization in practice is described, and justifications that are offered for such usage are examined. The authors present the case that dichotomization is rarely defensible and often will yield misleading results.

Cite this

Robert C. MacCallum, Shaobo Zhang, Kristopher J. Preacher, Derek D. Rucker (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.7.1.19

@article{c2002on,
  title  = {On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables.},
  author = {MacCallum, Robert C. and Zhang, Shaobo and Preacher, Kristopher J. and Rucker, Derek D.},
  year   = {2002},
  journal = {Psychological Methods},
  doi    = {10.1037//1082-989x.7.1.19}
}

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3,534 citations exist upstream.

References

Cited by