Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Sensitivity and Specificity of a Digit Symbol Recognition Trial in the Identification of Response Bias

9 references·16 citing·36 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1999Diagnostic Criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Proposed Standards for Clinical Practice and Research970 cited
2009American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the Neuropsychological Assessment of Effort, Response Bias, and Malingering869 cited
2005Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessityNAN Policy & Planning Committee836 cited
2007American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) Practice Guidelines for Neuropsychological Assessment and Consultation261 cited
2002The Rey 15-Item Recognition Trial: A Technique to Enhance Sensitivity of the Rey 15-Item Memorization Test217 cited
2003Effectiveness of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test and the Meyers and Meyers Recognition Trial in the Detection of Suspect Effort161 cited
2008Dementia and effort test performance154 cited
2008The Relationship of IQ to Effort Test Performance106 cited
2006Pain, Malingering, and Performance on the WAIS-III Processing Speed Index103 cited

Cited by

2012Evaluation of Malingering and Related Response Styles56 cited
2014Comparison of Credible Patients of Very Low Intelligence and Non-Credible Patients on Neurocognitive Performance Validity Indicators51 cited
2017A single error is one too many: Examining alternative cutoffs on Trial 2 of the TOMM51 cited
2018Reexamining performance validity cutoffs within the Complex Ideational Material and the Boston Naming Test–Short Form using an experimental malingering paradigm

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

50 cited

2018The Grooved Pegboard Test as a Validity Indicator—a Study on Psychogenic Interference as a Confound in Performance Validity Research46 cited

2017Utility of critical items within the Recognition Memory Test and Word Choice Test43 cited

2020Introducing a forced choice recognition trial to the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised43 cited

2018The Boston Naming Test as a Measure of Performance Validity39 cited

2019Stronger Together: The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition as a Multivariate Performance Validity Test in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury38 cited

2022Take Their Word for It: The Inventory of Problems Provides Valuable Information on Both Symptom and Performance Validity33 cited

2013Initial Clinical Validation of an Embedded Performance Validity Measure within the Automated Neuropsychological Metrics (ANAM)33 cited

2021This will only take a minute: Time cutoffs are superior to accuracy cutoffs on the forced choice recognition trial of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised30 cited

2012Re-Examination of the Rey Word Recognition Test29 cited

2013Effectiveness of the Comalli Stroop Test as a Measure of Negative Response Bias28 cited

2023Replicating a Meta-Analysis: The Search for the Optimal Word Choice Test Cutoff Continues25 cited

2021Flipping the Script: Measuring Both Performance Validity and Cognitive Ability with the Forced Choice Recognition Trial of the RCFT21 cited