Order Effects in Personnel Decision Making

Abstract

Research on primacy versus recency effects in personnel decision making was reconsidered within the framework of the belief-adjustment model of Hogarth and Einhorn (1992) in this article. The model posits that primacylrecency is a function of the interaction of various features of the judgment task. On the basis of this model, we predicted that recency effects will predominate in a simulated work sample, regardless of whether ratings are made after each work-sample exercise or only at the end of the process. One hundred seventeen university students received rater training and observed a candidate's performance in 2 role-play exercises. The conditions differed in terms of exercise order (positive-negative performance vs. negative-posi- tive performance) and response mode (step-by-step vs. end-of-sequence). Results were consistent with predictions. In addition, evidence was found for (within-target) contrast effects in the work-sample ratings. Implications of the model for selection and performance evaluation judgments are discussed.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 52 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.