Reflections on shared cognition

2001-03-01articleJournal of Organizational Behavior852 citationsgreen

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Team Dynamics and Performance Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Knowledge Management and Sharing

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to highlight several fundamental questions that remain regarding shared cognition: (1) What must be ‘shared’? (2) What does ‘shared’ mean? (3) How should ‘shared’ be measured? and (4) What outcomes do we expect shared cognition to affect? A general and integrative description of these questions is provided. In addition, the value of shared cognition is discussed along with recommendations for future research. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 852 citations exist upstream.

References

2000The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.

1994Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor?

1993Shared mental models in expert team decision making.

2001Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries

2013Individual and Group Decision Making

Cited by

2010Metaphor No More: A 15-Year Review of the Team Mental Model Construct

2008Team Implicit Coordination Processes: A Team Knowledge–Based Approach

2007The Impact of Knowledge Coordination on Virtual Team Performance over Time1

2012Interactive Team Cognition

2017PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework

2007Team Knowledge and Coordination in Geographically Distributed Software Development

2018Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving

2005Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective