Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Relative Validity of Scales Prepared By Naive Item Writers and Those Based On Empirical Methods of Personality Scale Construction1

9 references·2 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1950Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design734 cited
1958Content and style in personality assessment.405 cited
1971The dynamics of structured personality tests: 1971.389 cited
2000The dynamics of “structured” personality tests362 cited
1962Educational and Psychological Measurement352 cited
1967Comparative validity of different strategies of constructing personality inventory scales.207 cited
1945The dynamics of “structured” personality tests132 cited
1972Parameters of personality inventory construction and utilization: A comparison of prediction strategies and tactics.74 cited
1973In response to Jackson's challenge: The comparative validity of personality scales constructed by the external (empirical) strategy and scales developed intuitively by experts, novices, and laymen64 cited

Cited by

1984Optimizing the validity of personality assessments: The importance of aggregation and item content41 cited
2017Measures of Personality3 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work