SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications
6 references·2 citing·39 second hop
Committee peer review at an international research foundation: predictive validity and fairness of selection decisions on post-graduate fellowship applications (2005)Committee peer review at an international…Measuring Science (2004)Measuring ScienceGender bias in the refereeing process? (2002)Gender bias in the refereeing…Something rotten at the core of science? (2001)Something rotten at the core …First evidence of serious language-bias in the use of citation analysis for the evaluation of national science systems (2000)First evidence of serious lan…Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Manuscript Quality before and…THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF EVALUATION OF SCHOLARLY PERFORMANCE (1988)THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY …Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review (2008)Latent Markov modeling applie…Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review (2007)Row-column (RC) association m…The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)When worlds collide: Social science, politics, and the Rind et al. (1998) child sexual abuse meta-analysis. (2002)Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications (2006)Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure (2012)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses (2001)Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? (2005)Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in Articles for Medical Journals (1988)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)Scientific Careers: Universalism and Particularism (1995)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)US and Non-US Submissions (1998)Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants (2006)Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches (2009)The gendered nature of authorship (2021)Latent Class Analysis (1987)A Meta-Analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha (1994)Applied Latent Class Analysis (2002)The influence of the applicants’ gender on the modeling of a peer review process by using latent Markov models (2009)The changing research landscape and reflections on national research assessment in the future (2019)Face-to-face panel meetings versus remote evaluation of fellowship applications: simulation study at the Swiss National Science Foundation (2021)The frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents (1973)The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations (2000)For Your Citations Only? Hot Topics in Bibliometric Analysis (2005)Towards a new crown indicator: an empirical analysis (2011)Past, Present, and Future of Electronic Word of Mouth (EWOM) (2020)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. (1968)Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact (1980)Bibliometrics as a Tool for Analysis of R&D Impacts (1993)Research on research evaluation (1996)Scientific communities as autopoietic systems: The reproductive function of citations (2013)Citation Characteristics and Intellectual Acceptance of Scholarly Monographs (2008)National research impact indicators from Mendeley readers (2015)A scientometric analysis of selected GIScience journals (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
  • 2004Measuring Science279 cited
  • 2002Gender bias in the refereeing process?141 cited
  • 2001Something rotten at the core of science?105 cited
  • 1988THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF EVALUATION OF SCHOLARLY PERFORMANCE50 cited
  • 2000First evidence of serious language-bias in the use of citation analysis for the evaluation of national science systems49 cited

Cited by

  • 2008Latent Markov modeling applied to grant peer review18 cited
  • 2007Row-column (RC) association model applied to grant peer review9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work