SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Dashboard Shelves Open access My library Inbox Notes Write Learn Alerts

More

Ask your library Notifications Quick cite Review

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Validity of indirect comparisons in meta-analysis · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleValidity of indirect comparisons in meta-analysis

Deborah M Caldwell2007

OA

Articlebronze2007

Validity of indirect comparisons in meta-analysis

Deborah M Caldwell · Diana M. Gibb · Anthony E. Ades

36 citations·0/0 files stored·The Lancet

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 36 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2011Use of indirect comparison methods in systematic reviews: a survey of Cochrane review authors 2021Critical evaluation of reporting quality of network meta-analyses assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture

Details

Year2007

Typearticle

Published2007-01-01

VenueThe Lancet

ISSN-L0099-5355

Languageen

Citations36

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/s0140-6736(07)60138-x

openalex_workW1973373637

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.