Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

THE ROLE OF COGNITIVE ABILITY IN THE SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES AND INCREMENTAL VALIDITY OF ASSESSMENT CENTER EXERCISES

16 references·13 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1988Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning10,975 cited
1984Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance.2,101 cited
1993Personnel Selection in Organizations1,613 cited
1978Applied Psychology in Personnel Management663 cited
1984METAANALYSES OF VALIDITY STUDIES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1964 AND 1982 AND THE INVESTIGATION OF STUDY CHARACTERISTICS554 cited
1987Meta-analysis of assessment center validity.478 cited
1992Why is there no study of cultural equivalence in standardized cognitive ability testing?439 cited
1982VALIDITY AND FAIRNESS OF SOME ALTERNATIVE EMPLOYEE SELECTION PROCEDURES1392 cited
2005Staffing Organizations381 cited
1989Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving in mathematics and science.349 cited
1982Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings.267 cited
1987WHY DO ASSESSMENT CENTERS WORK? THE PUZZLE OF ASSESSMENT CENTER VALIDITY177 cited
1988The problem of group differences in ability test scores in employment selection147 cited
1996An Evaluation of Two Strategies for Reducing Adverse Impact and Their Effects on Criterion-Related Validity130 cited
1992

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

An exercise design approach to understanding assessment center dimension and exercise constructs.

107 cited

1977JOB SAMPLE VS. PAPER‐AND‐PENCIL TRADES AND TECHNICAL TESTS: ADVERSE IMPACT AND EXAMINEE ATTITUDES195 cited

Cited by

2006A reexamination of black-white mean differences in work performance: More data, more moderators.143 cited
2008WORK SAMPLE TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION: A META‐ANALYSIS OF BLACK–WHITE DIFFERENCES IN OVERALL AND EXERCISE SCORES72 cited
2012Reviewing, Categorizing, and Analyzing the Literature on Black–White Mean Differences for Predictors of Job Performance: Verifying Some perceptions and Updating/Correcting Others58 cited
2002g: Is This Your Final Answer?55 cited
2001EXPLORING BLACK‐WHITE SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES OF MANAGERIAL COMPETENCIES53 cited
2002MULTIPLE‐CHOICE AND CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE TESTS OF ABILITY: RACE‐BASED SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCES ON ALTERNATIVE PAPER‐AND‐PENCIL TEST FORMATS46 cited
2001Understanding the assessment center process: Where are we now?44 cited
2012Simulations41 cited
2005Work Sample Selection Tests and Expected Reduction in Adverse Impact: A Cautionary Note35 cited
2007Racial differences in promotion candidate performance and reactions to selection procedures: a field study in a diverse top‐management context22 cited
2005Trading Favors for Marketing Advantage: Evidence from Hong Kong, China, and the United States7 cited
2010Interest, ability and personality characteristics of two samples of employed realistic males: Implications for management and assessment.5 cited
2005Les centres d'évaluation en Belgique : résultats d'une étude sur leur validité et équité5 cited